I was playing around once again yesterday with the basic algebraic relations among the sets of (m)-associahedra partition polynomials
and the sets of (m)-noncrossing partitions polynomials
, which I’ve presented in several posts over the last year or so, and decided to post a few defining relations for the dual sets of polynomials in a question on Math Stack Exchange in the hope that the group would be recognized by someone. The MSE user Karl pointed out that it sounds like I was describing the infinite dihedral group, linking to the associated Wikipedia article. This led me to the Wiki on the dihedral group and a set of group relations that are shared by my group of partition polynomials. Each set
plays the role of a rotation
in the dihedral group and each set
, a reflection
. In the following I’ll show the applicability of these relations under the substitution operation I’ve illustrated in previous posts.
An infinite group
is formed by iterating the substitution operation on
and its inverse
. The elements of this infinite group are
where
is any integer;
, the identity; and, e.g.,
and
under the repeated operation.
The infinite sets of (m)-associahedra partition polynomials satisfy for any integer 
(I)
![[A^{(m)}]^2 = [I]](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5BA%5E%7B%28m%29%7D%5D%5E2+%3D+%5BI%5D&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
and
(II)
![[N]^{\pm 1}[A^{(m)}] = [A^{(m\pm1)}].](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5BN%5D%5E%7B%5Cpm+1%7D%5BA%5E%7B%28m%29%7D%5D+%3D+%5BA%5E%7B%28m%5Cpm1%29%7D%5D.&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
That is,
is involutive and
and
are the ladder ops–the raising and lowering ops–for the infinite set
comprised of the infinite sets
, where
runs over the infinite set of integers, as well as the ladder ops for the group
.
For any integers
and
, clearly, by the definition of
above,
![[N]^i[N]^j = [N]^{i+j},](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5BN%5D%5Ei%5BN%5D%5Ej+%3D+%5BN%5D%5E%7Bi%2Bj%7D%2C&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
and the relation
![[N]^{\pm 1}[A^{(m)}] = [A^{(m\pm1)}]](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5BN%5D%5E%7B%5Cpm+1%7D%5BA%5E%7B%28m%29%7D%5D+%3D+%5BA%5E%7B%28m%5Cpm1%29%7D%5D&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
implies
![[N]^{i}[A^{(j)}] = [A^{(j+i)}],](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5BN%5D%5E%7Bi%7D%5BA%5E%7B%28j%29%7D%5D+%3D+%5BA%5E%7B%28j%2Bi%29%7D%5D%2C&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
or equivalently
![[N]^{-i}[A^{(j)}] = [A^{(j-i)}].](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5BN%5D%5E%7B-i%7D%5BA%5E%7B%28j%29%7D%5D+%3D+%5BA%5E%7B%28j-i%29%7D%5D.&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
Recalling
, so
, and taking the inverse of this last equality gives
![([N]^{-i}[A^{(j)}])^{-1} = ([A^{(j-i)}])^{-1},](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%28%5BN%5D%5E%7B-i%7D%5BA%5E%7B%28j%29%7D%5D%29%5E%7B-1%7D+%3D+%28%5BA%5E%7B%28j-i%29%7D%5D%29%5E%7B-1%7D%2C&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
implying
![[A^{(j)}] [N]^{i} = [A^{(j-i)}].](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5BA%5E%7B%28j%29%7D%5D+%5BN%5D%5E%7Bi%7D+%3D+%5BA%5E%7B%28j-i%29%7D%5D.&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
Similarly, since
![[A^{(j)}] = [N]^j[A^{(0)}] = [A^{(j)}]^{-1}= ([N]^j[A^{(0)}])^{-1} = [A^{(0)}] [N]^{-j},](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5BA%5E%7B%28j%29%7D%5D+%3D++%5BN%5D%5Ej%5BA%5E%7B%280%29%7D%5D+%3D++%5BA%5E%7B%28j%29%7D%5D%5E%7B-1%7D%3D+%28%5BN%5D%5Ej%5BA%5E%7B%280%29%7D%5D%29%5E%7B-1%7D+%3D+%5BA%5E%7B%280%29%7D%5D+%5BN%5D%5E%7B-j%7D%2C&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
finally
![[A^{(i)}][A^{(j)}] = [N]^i[A^{(0)}][N]^j[A^{(0)}]](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5BA%5E%7B%28i%29%7D%5D%5BA%5E%7B%28j%29%7D%5D+%3D+%5BN%5D%5Ei%5BA%5E%7B%280%29%7D%5D%5BN%5D%5Ej%5BA%5E%7B%280%29%7D%5D&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
![= [N]^i[A^{(0)}][A^{(0)}][N]^{-j}](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%3D+%5BN%5D%5Ei%5BA%5E%7B%280%29%7D%5D%5BA%5E%7B%280%29%7D%5D%5BN%5D%5E%7B-j%7D&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
![= [N]^i[N]^{-j} = [N]^{i-j}.](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%3D+%5BN%5D%5Ei%5BN%5D%5E%7B-j%7D+%3D+%5BN%5D%5E%7Bi-j%7D.&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
Consequently, with
and
, my group satisfies the four relations

presented in the Wikipedia article on the dihedral group.
The group also satisfies the conjugation relations
1) ![[A^{(m)}][N]^n[A^{(m)}] = [N]^{-n}](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5BA%5E%7B%28m%29%7D%5D%5BN%5D%5En%5BA%5E%7B%28m%29%7D%5D+%3D+%5BN%5D%5E%7B-n%7D&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
and
2) ![[A^{(0)}][A^{(m)}][A^{(0)}] = [A^{(-m)}].](https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5BA%5E%7B%280%29%7D%5D%5BA%5E%7B%28m%29%7D%5D%5BA%5E%7B%280%29%7D%5D+%3D+%5BA%5E%7B%28-m%29%7D%5D.&bg=ffffff&fg=333333&s=0&c=20201002)
An analogous algebraic realization of the infinite dihedral group can be obtained by scaling the indeterminates by starting with multiplicative and compositional inversion of exponential generating functions (Taylor series) rather than ordinary generating function (power series). The extrapolation in both cases includes Laurent series. It would be interesting if there were other multivariate realizations under substitution.
Related stuff:
“Noncrossing partitions under rotation and reflection” by Callan and Smiley (pg.6)
“The power of group generators and relations: an examination of the concept and its applications” by Zhou
The Geometry and Topology of the Coxeter Groups by Davis
Group Theory by Milne
The CRM Winter School on Coxeter groups
Generalized Dihedral Group at GroupProps
“Dihedral group” by K. Conrad